×
welcome covers

Your complimentary articles

You’ve read all of your complimentary articles for this month. To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please


If you are a subscriber please sign in to your account.

To buy or renew a subscription please visit Subscriptions.

If you are a print subscriber you can contact us to create an online account.

Letters

Letters

Sustaining The Argument • Putting The ‘Me’ In Meaning • Pieces of Minds/Brains • Free Won’t? • Civil Wars Of Words

Sustaining The Argument

Dear Editor: In his article ‘Ecological Ethics’ in Issue 88, Tim Madigan offers the idea, “Some theists have argued that humans occupy a privileged position… This attitude is now being challenged by theists who maintain that God wishes humans to be stewards … of life on Earth – thereby showing the malleability of Scriptural interpretation.” This doesn’t follow. If some of my students believe 2+2=4 and others say 2+2=5, it doesn’t show the malleability of mathematical laws. It might show some of them need a lesson in maths.

In fact, the idea that human beings are privileged stewards is needed not just by theists, but by anyone who wants to make a case for environmental preservation rather than exploitation.