×
welcome covers

Your complimentary articles

You’ve read all of your complimentary articles for this month. To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please


If you are a subscriber please sign in to your account.

To buy or renew a subscription please visit Subscriptions.

If you are a print subscriber you can contact us to create an online account.

Jean-Paul Sartre at 100

By Any Means Necessary?

Ian Birchall on a moral problem for Sartre.

When Jean-Paul Sartre published Being and Nothingness in 1943, his conclusion promised a sequel. This was perhaps not the most enticing prospect for a reader who had just finished ploughing through 700 impenetrable pages. But in fact the book ended on a cliff-hanger. In a godless universe in which we are ‘condemned to be free’, it is all the same whether one becomes a leader of nations or gets drunk on one’s own. So did existentialism open the door to moral anarchy? Was Dostoevsky (as quoted by Sartre) right when he claimed: “If God did not exist, everything would be permitted”?

Sartre insisted this was not the case: an existentialist morality was not only possible, it would hit the bookstands shortly.