Your complimentary articles

You’ve read all of your complimentary articles for this month. To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please

If you are a subscriber please sign in to your account.

To buy or renew a subscription please visit Subscriptions.

If you are a print subscriber you can contact us to create an online account.

Sources of Knowledge

Challenging the Objectivity of Science

Sina Mirzaye Shirkoohi observes science to get the facts straight about it.

In his influential 1976 textbook What Is This Thing Called Science?, Alan Chalmers examines how scientific knowledge is acquired and validated, by looking at the methods underpinning scientific inquiry. He presents and explores the idea that science is fundamentally grounded in the acquisition of objective knowledge through direct observation; that sensory data serves as the bedrock upon which scientific understanding is built. Then he describes some of the criticisms of this picture, and various attempts by recent thinkers to build a more accurate model of the development of science. I want to carry this is a little further. The central thesis of my critique is that observations in science are not purely objective: they’re influenced most notably by theoretical frameworks, prior knowledge, and subjective biases that shape how data are perceived and interpreted.

…