×
welcome covers

Your complimentary articles

You’ve read all of your complimentary articles for this month. To have complete access to the thousands of philosophy articles on this site, please


If you are a subscriber please sign in to your account.

To buy or renew a subscription please visit Subscriptions.

If you are a print subscriber you can contact us to create an online account.

Letters

Letters

The Atheists Strike Back • A Goff of Limited Power • Since You Asked • The Problem Is The Medium • Ducking Responsibility • What About Compassion?

The Atheists Strike Back

Dear Editor: I have problems with Anselm’s ontological argument which was summarised in Issue 165. It’s: ‘God is the greatest; It is greater to exist than not exist; Therefore God exists’. The first premise is an unevidenced assertion which implies the conclusion. And ‘greatest’ is meaningful only in relation to a defined scale of value. It sometimes means ‘biggest’; but we might speak of the greatest wine or the greatest marathon runner.